<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KettlebellFitness.net &#187; Diet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kettlebellfitness.net/category/diet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kettlebellfitness.net</link>
	<description>Kettlebell Enthusiast blog with Video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 01:29:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	

		<copyright>admin</copyright>
		<itunes:author>admin</itunes:author>
		<itunes:summary>Just another WordPress weblog</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		
		<item>
		<title>Lowly Walnut Deemed World&#039;s Healthiest Nut</title>
		<link>http://www.kettlebellfitness.net/2011/03/30/lowly-walnut-deemed-worlds-healthiest-nut/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kettlebellfitness.net/2011/03/30/lowly-walnut-deemed-worlds-healthiest-nut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-oxidants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kettlebellfitness.net/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A <a title="Walnuts offer anti-oxidant protection" href="http://portal.acs.org/portal/acs/corg/content?_nfpb=true&#38;_pageLabel=PP_ARTICLEMAIN&#38;node_id=222&#38;content_id=CNBP_026930&#38;use_sec=true&#38;sec_url_var=region1&#38;__uuid=79fad6c7-23b0-476f-83fb-3af8d6d6bb42" target="_blank">press release</a> from the American Chemical Society (!) reports on a study showing that walnuts provide more heart healthy anti-oxidants than any other nut.   Compared to almonds, peanuts, pistachios, hazelnuts, Brazil nuts, cashews,  macadamias, and pecans, walnuts had the highest levels of antioxidants.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kettlebellfitness.net/2011/03/30/lowly-walnut-deemed-worlds-healthiest-nut/" class="more-link">More on Lowly Walnut Deemed World&#039;s Healthiest Nut</a></p>


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a title="Walnuts offer anti-oxidant protection" href="http://portal.acs.org/portal/acs/corg/content?_nfpb=true&amp;_pageLabel=PP_ARTICLEMAIN&amp;node_id=222&amp;content_id=CNBP_026930&amp;use_sec=true&amp;sec_url_var=region1&amp;__uuid=79fad6c7-23b0-476f-83fb-3af8d6d6bb42" target="_blank">press release</a> from the American Chemical Society (!) reports on a study showing that walnuts provide more heart healthy anti-oxidants than any other nut.   Compared to almonds, peanuts, pistachios, hazelnuts, Brazil nuts, cashews,  macadamias, and pecans, walnuts had the highest levels of antioxidants.</p>
<p>This study is apparently the first one to compare the anti-oxidant benefits of varieties of widely available nuts.</p>
<p>The author of the study, <a title="Joe Vinson, Ph.D" href="http://academic.scranton.edu/faculty/vinson/" target="_blank">Joe Vinson, Ph.D.</a> notes that nuts account for barely 8% of the anti-oxidants in the average diet.  People wrongly believe that consuming nuts will cause weight gain or that nuts contain unhealthy fats.</p>
<p>Previous studies have indicated that nuts induce a feeling of satiation, and thus help dieters control calorie consumption.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kettlebellfitness.net/2011/03/30/lowly-walnut-deemed-worlds-healthiest-nut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Calorie Counting Matters</title>
		<link>http://www.kettlebellfitness.net/2010/07/12/why-calorie-counting-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kettlebellfitness.net/2010/07/12/why-calorie-counting-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Ginsberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Calorie burning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counting calories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kettlebellfitness.net/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I am not happy that calorie counting matters, but it really does.  Like many of my peers, I could stand to lose a few pounds.  In my teens and twenties, it was fairly easy to lose weight &#8211; just increase my physical activity and, presto, the weight would come off without any diet modification.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kettlebellfitness.net/2010/07/12/why-calorie-counting-matters/" class="more-link">More on Why Calorie Counting Matters</a></p>


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not happy that calorie counting matters, but it really does.  Like many of my peers, I could stand to lose a few pounds.  In my teens and twenties, it was fairly easy to lose weight &#8211; just increase my physical activity and, presto, the weight would come off without any diet modification.</p>
<p>Sad to say, those days are over.   Even with 4 to 5 rigorous, 90 minute workouts a week, those excess pounds are very slow to come off.</p>
<p>Nutrition experts as well as physicians with whom I have discussed this are fairly blunt &#8211; you have to count calories.</p>
<p>What does this mean, in a practical sense?  In my case, I need about 2,750 calories a day to maintain my weight.   A vigorous workout burns around 800 calories, so I can consume around 3,500 calories a day and not gain any weight.  A pound is equal to 3,500 calories.    Assuming that 2 days a week, I consume 3,500 calories, I need to limit myself to 2800 calories a day for 5 days a week to drop a pound a week.</p>
<p>I can&#039;t eat too few &#8211; or my body will go into starvation mode.</p>
<p>Recently, I started counting calories.   I made some surprising discoveries.</p>
<ul>
<li>I enjoy popcorn and I use a Whirley-pop 6 quart popper that uses 1/2 cup of popcorn kernels and 3 to 4 tbsp of oil &#8211; 6 quarts = 1,536 calories</li>
<li>I enjoy French bread and butter or Smart Balance &#8211; my portion costs me between 1,200 and 1,500 calories</li>
<li>Pizza &#8211; 3 slices of cheese pizza &#8211; 500 calories</li>
<li>chicken breast (8 oz.) &#8211; 450 calories</li>
<li>rice (flavored) &#8211; my portion around 800 calories</li>
</ul>
<p>In my case, portion size is the problem, as is speed of eating.   I am using the <a title="About.com Calorie Count" href="http://caloriecount.about.com" target="_blank">About.com Calorie Count online</a> service to track what I eat &#8211; we&#039;ll see how it goes.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kettlebellfitness.net/2010/07/12/why-calorie-counting-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

